Monday, December 18, 2006

 

Getting Ready for 2007

At the end of every year, I perform a ritual of studying and reviewing every stock publicly traded that closed at or within 5 percent of a 52 week high. I feel strongly that the best stocks will always be found on the 52 week high list, which all investors should study-- in order to get a feel for what is working.

Sure, you can fuck around and make believe you are Gordon Gekko and buy some dog shit stock with hopes of a hail mary turnaround. But, in the real world, find comfort in the fact that other people know more than you. Moreover, the short way to ride their coat tails is by buying stocks on the 52 week high list.

Now, don't get me wrong, I do not suggest buying a stock just because it is at a new high. No siree bob. That would be fucktarded. Instead, start your weeding out process with stocks at or within 5% of a new high. After that, check company descriptions, revenue/growth, gross margins, price/sales, price to book ratio's and competition. Then, after all that, sift through old press releases, read SEC filings and listen to old conference calls.

At the end of your screening, you might just find another HANS or AKAM.

Granted, this screening process will take a long time and is not for everyone. I do it because I am obsessed with finding new idea's and keeping an edge over my competition. However, even if I only ran my own money, I would still do it-- just for the sake of a good treasure hunt.

For example:

Here is my 2005 52 week high list with 2006 performance numbers.

NOTE: Green highlights significant outperformance, while red represents heavy losses.

As you can see, I break stocks down by market caps. Had you did a little research and bought some of 2005's big winners, you might have made some big coin in 2006. Some winners include: AIRM +70%, BITS +125%, ROLL +78%, KNOT +139%, SIGM +71%, ANDE +85%, KNXA +56%, ICON +94%, CLB +136%, GOLD +42%, TCC +92%, ACLI +126%, RTI +106%, WBD +136%, TTEC +91%, BGC +124%, SSRI +95%, OS +110%, FMCN +109%, NITE +101%, TWTC +112%, CAL +108%, ISE +81%, BLS +81% and LFC +201%.

My point: Just because a stock is up big during a year, doesn't mean it is done going higher. As a matter of fact, stocks at 52 week highs tend to stay near highs, barring a fundamental change with the company or market. Furthermore, if you are looking for the "next big thing," it will always be found on the new high list.

Also, it's worth noting, 2005's 52 week low list performed well in '06. Here is the list. Winners include: DTV, FS, CMCSA, NWS, V, DISH and GM. So far, I haven't put together a 2006 new low list. However, looking at my screen data, big losers in '06 include: GSK, MU, RDN, SFD, IMCL, LSTR, FWRD, ABFS, LEND, GGC, LZB, WIRE, TOPT, SOLD, BBA and BF'b.

Finally, here is the 2006 list of stocks at or within 5% of a new high.

NOTE: The 2006 list is incomplete and only goes up to 5 billion market cap. But, you get the idea.

NOTE II: Please take the new "Fly Survey." Are you bullish or bearish on the markets?

Comments:
Do you trade any differantly before the end of the year for tax purposes?
I remember last year we had a good run up in January, do you expect that to happen again?
 
I can't spell differently.
 
Any thoughts on the Casino stocks? I am thinking about MGM because LVS and WYNN seem too expensive.
 
Broker,
Thoughts on ORCL today?
 
Markets flattish til year end. No reason to commit new money. Profit taking induced correction coming in January.
 
Ditto on NTRI - are you getting nervous or ready to buy? I'm thinking buy, but the stock is sure saying they're going to miss on 4Q. Lehman, Citi say they're good.
 
I like ORCL here.

NTRI looks too weak today.

Casino stocks are too pricey for me.
 
Along the lines of innovation plays for next year, what about QI, MXIC, and ENER with phase-change memory trashing flash (and SNDK). I guess the question is whether the big partners (IBM, INTC, etc) in these efforts will make the money while the little companies who figured it out get nice frameable merit certificates to hang on the wall. Also, it's not clear which year will be "the" year for phase-change.
 
Broker A,

Looking at your 2006 new low list some have rather obvious reasons for under-performance. Are there any of them you look at and scratch your head wondering why they are down? Or to put it another way, are some just in a down sector (like LEND) and poised to bounce in 2007?
 
BF'b is a head scratcher.
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

 Subscribe in a reader

DISCLAIMER: This is a personal web site, reflecting the opinions of its author. It is not a production of my employer, and it is unaffiliated with any FINRA broker/dealer. Statements on this site do not represent the views or policies of anyone other than myself. The information on this site is provided for discussion purposes only, and are not investing recommendations. Under no circumstances does this information represent a recommendation to buy or sell securities.