Saturday, April 28, 2007
Seasonality in the Stock Market: Part II
In the first part of the article, we looked at some evidence purporting the existence of monthly and seasonal trends in the stock market as a whole. Before diving into the seasonality of individual stocks, I'd like to take a minute to address one aspect of the annual seasonality of the market.
According to Fisher, the weakness observed in the first half of a president's term is probably due to all of the changes that a new administration is likely to impose on the country. He explains that, "Markets view the redistribution of wealth or property rights [by a new presdiential administration] like witnessing a mugging. It causes fear beyond the size of the action itself because it makes all witnesses realize that they could be mugged next. Consequently, the market can be weak somewhere in the first two years because the market doesn't like the politically forced changed." Makes sense to me.
But Fisher himself isn't terribly bullish about his findings. He continues, "I'd see its being a third year as a definite mild market positive. Would I bet the house on it? No way. If lots of people start talking about the third year being positive and getting excited about it, I'd know this phenomenon was discounted into pricing already and I wouldn't count on it at all." Efficient Market Theory strikes again. Interesting phenomenon, though.
In the third and final part of this article, we'll take a look at how seasonality affects individual stocks and how we might benefit from it.
"More on this later."
After last year's publication of The Only Three Questions That Count, market pundits such as Eric Bolling have been talking quite a bit about the "Presidential Term Anomaly." Basically, the "Presidential Term Anomaly" states that the third year of a presidential term is usually the best year to be invested in stocks. On page 73 of The Only Three Questions That Count, Ken Fisher (who apparently knows his stuff) has a table that lists all of the presidential administrations since 1926 followed by the corresponding annual return of the S&P 500 (which was started in '26). Fisher's study can be summarized as follows:
According to Fisher, the weakness observed in the first half of a president's term is probably due to all of the changes that a new administration is likely to impose on the country. He explains that, "Markets view the redistribution of wealth or property rights [by a new presdiential administration] like witnessing a mugging. It causes fear beyond the size of the action itself because it makes all witnesses realize that they could be mugged next. Consequently, the market can be weak somewhere in the first two years because the market doesn't like the politically forced changed." Makes sense to me.
But Fisher himself isn't terribly bullish about his findings. He continues, "I'd see its being a third year as a definite mild market positive. Would I bet the house on it? No way. If lots of people start talking about the third year being positive and getting excited about it, I'd know this phenomenon was discounted into pricing already and I wouldn't count on it at all." Efficient Market Theory strikes again. Interesting phenomenon, though.
In the third and final part of this article, we'll take a look at how seasonality affects individual stocks and how we might benefit from it.
Comments:
<< Home
In baseball if the visitor loses the first 2 games of a 3 game series..and the home team has an off day after the 3rd game. The visitor wins the 3rd game 91% of the time. Is it true? Hell if I know.
2007 and 1984 don't seem to have all that much in common. Old fuckers say "Stocks always seek new highs". There are so many new different variables in play in our markets today. How can anybody time the market. Except for Fly of course.
Thanks for the overtime Jeremy--Look forward to see what your watching.
2007 and 1984 don't seem to have all that much in common. Old fuckers say "Stocks always seek new highs". There are so many new different variables in play in our markets today. How can anybody time the market. Except for Fly of course.
Thanks for the overtime Jeremy--Look forward to see what your watching.
I'm glad that everyone (besides mark and kc) seems to like the article.
Part III will be up tomorrow morning. Something just came up in the family, so I'm a bit busy.
Later
Part III will be up tomorrow morning. Something just came up in the family, so I'm a bit busy.
Later
Broker A: Don't you have a little league game to coach? Have you called the umpire a Fucktard yet? I bet Billy Martin would have learned a few new words in his day.
Trader:
I have a game tomorrow, 6pm.
I'll have you know, "The Fly" is quite civilized in public, especially around kids.
However, put me in an office, with caffeine and stocks, and I'll throw a fucking hand ax at you.
Post a Comment
I have a game tomorrow, 6pm.
I'll have you know, "The Fly" is quite civilized in public, especially around kids.
However, put me in an office, with caffeine and stocks, and I'll throw a fucking hand ax at you.
<< Home