Fly on WallStreet

This comment has been removed by the author.
 

This afternoon I sent an e-mail to Microvision's investor relations team, expressing my disappointment in CFO's decision to sell company stock. Surprisingly, I got a response just a few hours later. I initially posted the entire letter in the comment above, but I've just noticed the NDA at the bottom of the response.

The jist of the reply was that Mr. Wilson sold stock for personal reasons related to his financial situation. Although this is probably just a standard PR spin, it was nice to hear.
 

KM--

I saw your initial post.Apparently, that was a canned response Microvision was sending out.

My office got the exact same reply.

Tokman's reply to me was similar, but almost the same.

Fuckers.
 

I thinking CFC my see 28-29 next day or two....what say you all?
 

Bullshit and Bear shit - the price of a stock moves on trend, volume and price. Time Knight, Cramer, who gives a fuck - MVIS did not act like a stock that had been adversely affected by the news. I think if I were a "scalper" it would be a lovely stock to play with 10 times a day. It has a range - a predictable volume - and acts like a small cap stock - in its normal evolution - when the MOT news came out It acted (to 5.75) and reacted (back to 4.75)just like a small cap company with good news and no direct cash flow consequences from the news. If I'm wrong - I'd love to hear it with facts not some immature bullshit. there are two reasons that MVIS may take a price hit. The first is permanent bad news the second (great news coming but held back in confidence) while the speculators try and push out the weakies - buy in - and then let it rip up.
 

here we thought you left for good....OTr at least thats you said
 

MVIS will unveil a new donut maker, using Picop technology.
 

will it project starbuck logo on cup of dunken coffee????
 

I am concerned about the pending mark-to-market adjustment of the MVIS mortgage loan portfolio?
 

Yes, but their patents are certainly lacking.

Viz.
 

but of course
 

Tim Knight's charts are all whack. They only go back to 06. Great fuckin' analysis buck-o.
 

I think he uses non-log charts too, for effect...

___________

Brian, re CFC: I say "Yeah" and "Verily!"
 

Do they serve rib-eyes in hell?
 

People, people.

I do NOT use non-log charts. I mean, maybe 1 time out of 500.

As for dining in hell - - was this a reference to the short-lived rally from this morning? Yeah, well. I'll take more hell, then.